Medical Cannabis Service Providers


Zip Code Search

Radius:
 Miles
From:

Login

11362.5.

(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.
(b)
(1) The people of the State of California hereby find and declare that the purposes of the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 are as follows:
(A) To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief.
(B) To ensure that patients and their primary caregivers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.
(C) To encourage the federal and state governments to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana.

(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that endangers others, nor to condone the diversion of marijuana for nonmedical purposes.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no physician in this state shall be punished, or denied any right or privilege, for having recommended marijuana to a patient for medical purposes.
(d) Section 11357, relating to the possession of marijuana, and Section 11358, relating to the cultivation of marijuana, shall not apply to a patient, or to a patient's primary caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician.
(e) For the purposes of this section, "primary caregiver" means the individual designated by the person exempted under this section who has consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of that person.


Sacramento Abandons Numerical Cap on Medical Pot Shops PDF Print E-mail
States - California
Written by Peter Gabriel Keyes   
Friday, 30 July 2010 21:01

Have we come a long way?

City Council members in Sacramento unanimously voted to support their most liberal proposal to date regarding medical marijuana dispensaries at their Tuesday, July 27, 2010 meeting.

Sacramento, California has quite a few medicinal cannabis collectives operating openly as storefront businesses in the city.  Elected officials had, thus far, been leaning towards a proposal that would have capped the number of dispensaries allowed in the city at 12.  Tuesday’s decision obliterated that cap. The limit of 12 was criticized by many as arbitrary.  The change was welcome news to a thriving local patient community that previously feared a local crackdown on its dispensaries.

Last Updated on Friday, 30 July 2010 21:07
 
Local Pot Tax Hurried Onto Sac Ballot PDF Print E-mail
States - California
Written by Peter Gabriel Keyes   
Thursday, 22 July 2010 08:00

Putting the cart before the camel

Sacramento, California, is a hotbed for cannabis.  Dozens of medical marijuana dispensaries operate in the city.  A local ordinance regulating dispensaries is being drafted, and is expected to be voted up or down by the city council sometime in late 2010.  In November, Californians will vote on Proposition 19, a state initiative that would allow localities to tax and regulate cannabis as they see fit.  The City of Sacramento has a $43 million budget deficit, and elected officials are eying cannabis revenues to potentially help reduce the city’s debt.  At their June 22, 2010 public meeting, the Sacramento City Council signaled wide interest in placing a marijuana tax on the November, 2010 ballot.  The pot tax was quietly placed by city staff on the council’s agenda, along with a broader, unrelated tax proposal.

 
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CONTINUES MEDICAL MARIJUANA PROSECUTION OF TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT PDF Print E-mail
States - California
Written by Mark Robert Bluemel   
Friday, 02 April 2010 08:35

13 months after her arrest in Operation GreenRx, Donna Lambert will face additional charges to her 7 felony count for medical marijuana

SAN DIEGO - On Friday, April 2nd at 1:30pm, Donna Lambert has been ordered to be arraigned on additional charges stemming from her arrest in the Operation GreenRx Sting in San Diego County last February 2009.  San Diego County is well known for its fierce attempt to overturn California's state medical marijuana laws. Advocates have long criticized the San Diego District Attorney's office for targeting and prosecuting medical marijuana defendants who collectively associate under the Medical Marijuana Program Act.    

 
West Sacramento Pot Shop Law In Jeopardy PDF Print E-mail
States - California
Written by Peter Gabriel Keyes   
Wednesday, 13 January 2010 07:42

“I can’t vote for this because of all the legal threats,” warned West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon.  He was referring to the city’s medical marijuana dispensary ordinance.  It was a very tense situation. No actual legal threats had been issued.  But many cannabis advocates and lawyers alike notified the City of West Sacramento that its draft ordinance had numerous legal vulnerabilities.  

For starters, the city is attempting to force dispensary patrons to purchase a state issued identification card.  That will not pass legal muster, because the California state I.D. card program is explicitly voluntary.  

Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 16:49
 
Ca NORML Testimony on the Legalization of Marijuana PDF Print E-mail
States - California
Written by Dale H. Gieringer, Ph.D.   
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 12:11

Testimony on the Legalization of Marijuana

To the California Assembly Committee on Public Safety

By Dale H. Gieringer, Ph.D.

Director, California NORML – www.canorml.org

October 28, 2009

I thank the members of the California Assembly Public Safety Legislative Committee for holding this hearing on the legalization of marijuana. I am here today representing California NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, a public-interest lobby representing the interests of the millions of responsible adult marijuana users .[1]

Marijuana should be legal for the same reason that alcohol, tobacco, caffeine and other substances are legal: (1) millions of Californians value and enjoy its use; (2) their use poses no inordinate hazards to society; (3) the prohibition of marijuana artificially creates crime and black-market traffic in the same way as alcohol prohibition and (4) deprives our economy of legal business and revenues.

The laws against marijuana wrongly criminalize millions of otherwise law-abiding Californians. Three million Californians used marijuana last year and over 15 million have done so in their lifetimes.[2] Among them are noted professionals and business people, Nobel Laureates, artists and musicians, sports and entertainment stars, and luminaries in this Capitol.[3]

Despite California's 1976 (partial) decriminalization law, possession of one ounce or less remains a criminal misdemeanor punishable by a fine. Marijuana use may also be punished by loss of employment, public housing, child custody, security clearance, student loans, revocation of parole or probation, etc.

Last Updated on Monday, 11 January 2010 09:34
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2

Cannabis Yields And Dosage

Cannabis Yields And Dosage by Chris Conrad
Cannabis Yields And Dosage is the authoritative study of the science and legalities of calculating medical marijuana. By Chris Conrad

Polls

Legal Cannabis should be
 

Site Search